Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Saturday, April 22, 2017

I just can't get enough of Hillary losing

I gotta confess that I found Hillary losing to Donald Trump to be amazingly satisfying.
What I'm not surprised by is her or the democrats utter failure to recognize the reasons why.

The Other McCain has a post up where they talk about the disconnect that the party has with voters.

How Bad Was the Hillary Campaign?
Matt Taibbi is certainly not my favorite political journalist, and Rolling Stone was permanently disgraced by the UVA hoax, but nevertheless Taibbi’s brief review of the new Clinton campaign book, Shattered by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, is very worthwhile reading. After recounting the comedic failure of Clinton insiders to figure out their campaign’s raison d’etre — why did Hillary want to be president? — Taibbi summarizes the problem briefly and accurately:~snip~
The interesting thing is that they also discuss why the republican party has the same problem with completely ignoring the concerns of voters.
There's a particularly odious little RINO on facebook that I've had some interaction with who personifies the RINO cuckservative mindset perfectly.
He proclaims himself to be the "bestest" conservative ever and then proceeds to tell everyone how stupid they are if they don't agree with him.
He really doesn't understand how Trump could have bested the entire field of pompous elitist republican weasels even while Trump knocked em off one by one. Voters responded to Trump speaking about the rule of law, border security, bloated government, unemployment and crappy trade agreements that disadvantaged American workers.
Even after that the remaining candidates couldn't even alter their positions enough to appeal to the voters.
So they fell off one by one until Trump got the nomination.

Both political parties suffer from a severe case of aloofness and instead of wanting to appeal to voters on what concerns them they want to tell us "who we are".

Pretty piss poor strategy for someone who wants the popular vote if you ask me. We tried it their way for about 2 decades and it didn't work so now it's time to try something new.

You gotta wonder if they have learned their lesson yet, that they are supposed to represent us, not dictate to us.
I guess we'll see.

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Return of Hillary in 2020?

Hillary Clinton is considering another run for president – and is mulling the idea of launching a television talk show to soften the ground for 2020.

Clinton would be 73 years old if she were to challenge President Donald Trump – again – and win the White House the next time around.

Launching a TV program now would make her America's second-oldest female news or talk show host on the small screen, after only Joy Behar of 'The View.'

Author Ed Klein wrote Wednesday on his blog that according to a Clinton insider, the former secretary of state is open to the idea.~snip~
I don't really know how reliable this is but you gotta wonder how much rejection Hillary can take. Even if she ran a third time and by some miracle won,after being rejected twice before,how serious could anybody take it?
The democrats would have to pull out all the stops available to accomplish it and even then it would reduce the office to a consolation prize.
Bad idea all around in my opinion.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

Our Possible Commander in Chief

This is what we could be projecting to the world next year.



We can choose this, or someone who says mean things.
Your call.

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Media Bias on Display

I've thought for decades and have seen it verified over and over again that the media is basically just a propaganda arm for leftist democrats.
Not just in the big things but in the smaller things also.
Here's something to think about.

Guess what was so controversial that CNN had to blur it out?
Speaking as someone who watches cable news in general and CNN in particular seven days a week, I’ve seen them air some significantly off-putting video at times. It usually comes with a warning for small children to leave the room, but we’ve seen videos of people being shot, horrific automobile or train wrecks and the carnage left behind after terror attacks. Rarely does CNN engage in censorship to the extent of applying a “blur” to images unless there’s some nudity or a close up of an actual dead body. But this week their sister network, Headline News, finally found an image too objectionable to air. It was a gentleman (identified as a hero) from New Jersey who had saved a toddler from a sweltering hot vehicle. So what required the blur? He was wearing a Trump 2016 shirt. (Daily Wire)~
Now there's an argument to be made that the guy wore that shirt to specifically insert his politics into an interview that wasn't about politics and HLN blurred it out so it wouldn't distract from story about saving the infant.
But that's pretty weak sauce considering that if it was a ready for Hillary shirt I doubt if they would have had the same considerations.
After all,think about the history of the rabid leftwing lapdog media. If you think they would have treated a Hillary shirt the same then congratulations, your brain has been successfully washed.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Hillary Draws a Blank

I've been reading more about Hillary's seeming health problems with other videos showing her shaking and blanking out.
It's kind of a concern.



There's tons of reasons to be suspect of Hillary Clinton from her days in Arkansas married to Billy "BJ" Clinton to the way she has lied and covered up for anyone who could possibly enrich her or allow her to grift off others.
I'm not against having a woman as president, just not this woman.

Anyway health issues are a concern but the Clinton's have a record of hiding or distorting the truth from the public with the media more than happy to help them out.
What a choice for POTUS huh?

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Lets walk the other way today

How would you like to stroll by this everyday?


Swimsuit mural of Hillary Clinton creates a stir in Australia

I'm kind of surprised that their only objection is the near nudity.
 "We believe it is offensive because of the depiction of a near-naked woman, not on the basis of disrespect to Hillary Clinton, in accordance with the Graffiti Prevention Act 2007," the council's chief executive Stephen Wall told Fairfax Media on Friday.

I don't know where the artist got his inspiration but this photo shop has been floating around the nets for a while.


Somehow I believe that Bubba has a copy of this pic in his wallet.
People need to learn that just because you can do something don't mean you should.